Asia Blog: China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam

The kind folks at Work Unit have published a list of guidelines used by the editors and writers at Xinhua, China’s official newspaper. Surprisingly, most of the advice is to avoid racial stereotyping of the sort seen in America’s early days. Except, in our case where it was mostly black v.s. white, writers in China have to be aware of a huge number of ethnic minorities and their sensitivities.

Unfortunately, there are a number of politically sensitive editorial demands:

• Don’t use “Islamic fundamentalism” or “Islamic fundamentalists.” Use “religious extremism” as a substitute.
• It is strictly forbidden to refer to Xinjiang as “East Turkistan.”
• The Diaoyutai Islands must not be called the Senkaku Islands.
• The Nansha Islands must not be called the Spratly Islands.
• Do not write “Tourists from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan visit China.” The proper use is “Tourists from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan visit the mainland.”

As you can see, most of these come from the desire to strengthen China’s claims on territory it contests with other nations, or territories which have their own seditious desires. Taiwan, HK, and Macau are given special attention; they must always be included as parts of China, not separate nations.

There are also a few completely strange guidelines, like “In all reports concerning persons who believe in Islam, pork must not be mentioned.” That’s about the same as saying, “In all reports concerning persons who like to wear socks, bare feet must not be mentioned.” Still, Xinhua gets a nod for their tact, even if it is overly sensitive.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007 at 4:05 am and is tagged with diaoyutai islands, nansha islands, senkaku islands, east turkistan, religious extremism, taiwan visit, islamic fundamentalism, islamic fundamentalists, ethnic minorities, racial stereotyping, kind folks, xinhua, editorial guidelines, spratly islands, tact, nod, mainland, macau, hk, desires. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Please take time to enjoy the archives: October 2008 (4) September 2008 (3) August 2008 (5) July 2008 (5) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (3) April 2008 (1) March 2008 (4) January 2008 (3) December 2007 (1) November 2007 (2) October 2007 (3) September 2007 (1) August 2007 (2) July 2007 (8) June 2007 (4) May 2007 (5) April 2007 (3) March 2007 (3) February 2007 (6) January 2007 (6) December 2006 (7) November 2006 (3) October 2006 (6) September 2006 (2) August 2006 (6) July 2006 (8) June 2006 (6) May 2006 (4) April 2006 (12) March 2006 (4) February 2006 (17) January 2006 (9) December 2005 (5) November 2005 (4) October 2005 (8) September 2005 (1) August 2005 (4) July 2005 (4) June 2005 (4) May 2005 (3) April 2005 (8) March 2005 (11) February 2005 (2) January 2005 (7) December 2004 (10) November 2004 (9)

Fresh, related resources: